View Full Version : Camera Help - Lens Question
Batey
27-11-2007, 12:17 PM
Hey just wondering if someone could tell me the difference between an IS lens and just a normal lens. Im looking at a few different twin lens packs and wonderin gif its worth the extra money for IS lens. Keep in mind its mainly sports and stuff like that i will use if for.
Thanks in advance
Lemontime
27-11-2007, 12:23 PM
IS = Image Stabilisation.
That means if you're not very steady of hand you should probably go for that, but they can only be used with canon cameras..
Other brands of lenses also have the same concept.
Guessing you're going for Canon?
John U
27-11-2007, 12:35 PM
From my experience it works pretty well. But in saying that the picture sharpness could be due to a number of other factors. I haven't compared it to a lens without IS.
Batey
27-11-2007, 03:45 PM
Thanks guys.
Been thinking about it for a fair while now and decided to finaly get one.
I was going for a canon 400d. Seems that you can't go wrong for a first SLR.
Im thinking i will get the the two IS lens kit.
Thanks again guys
pinned--->
27-11-2007, 03:52 PM
Thanks guys.
Been thinking about it for a fair while now and decided to finaly get one.
I was going for a canon 400d. Seems that you can't go wrong for a first SLR.
Im thinking i will get the the two IS lens kit.
Thanks again guys
Nice one. Pretty bloody good deal with the 18-55 and 75-300mm. I picked up the kit for $1188.
Batey
27-11-2007, 03:58 PM
Nice one. Pretty bloody good deal with the 18-55 and 75-300mm. I picked up the kit for $1188.
Was that with IS lenses? I was loking around $1350 with IS
pinned--->
27-11-2007, 04:01 PM
Was that with IS lenses? I was loking around $1350 with IS
Nah wouldnt think so. I say save yourself the cash and just get a tripod. Thats what I did.
BM Epic
27-11-2007, 04:16 PM
Nah wouldnt think so. I say save yourself the cash and just get a tripod. Thats what I did.Get a manfrotto fluid head tripod,best tripod money can buy,i have one and they are superb and sexy!!!
OISTAFARMA
27-11-2007, 08:20 PM
What sort of photography you look at getting into? High speed sports will still need a fast shutter speed and big aperture, I'm dubious as to whether a IS lens will give any real asstistance at these high speeds on relatively low magnification. If your into taking pics of a chess game from 1km away through a 1200mm lens it's a different story:p. I worked for a professional photographer for about 4 years and got a little knowledge, so any questions, fire away.
Edit-
The other option is to get some Canon F series lenses which have better quality glass and most get a better depth of field
little man
27-11-2007, 08:36 PM
its the canon L series not the f. they have the red stripe at the front and the big Tele's are white.
i reckon go for the is lens' you wont need them for iding shots, but for indoor family stuff you prob will.
brisneyland
27-11-2007, 09:11 PM
IS is great. Definitely get it if you have the option, it really extends the usable range of your camera in terms of lighting situations.
Batey
27-11-2007, 09:21 PM
Thanks for all the help guys.
Im looking at maily riding and wakeboarding shots.
But i also take alot of close up model railway and large scale real railway photos.
I think the IS will be worth while for the railway photos. Tend to take shots from long distances and normaly dont have time to set up a tripod.
Anyway ill have to give it all some more thought.
Thanks heaps for the response.
Cheers
Batey
OISTAFARMA
28-11-2007, 08:22 AM
its the canon L series not the f. they have the red stripe at the front and the big Tele's are white.
i reckon go for the is lens' you wont need them for iding shots, but for indoor family stuff you prob will.
Haha, that it is. My bad
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.