Uni law help

[at the drive in]

I am doing a law subject at uni and it is assignment time i am having a bit of trouble i was wondering if any body had any ideas for what i could write about for the essay. This is the assignment below. The case briefs were no problem it is just the stupid essay.

In contract law, the courts try to reconcile the competing interests of litigants, that is, the plaintiffs and the defendants.
A. Choose 3 contract law cases from the list below.
B. Analyse each case individually, basing your analysis on the methodology described in the handout for Tutorial 5. (You should aim to write approximately 200-250 words per case analysis.)
C. Using your analyses of the 3 cases and by undertaking further relevant research, discuss the statement above.
�� The Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd v Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379
�� Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256
�� Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337
�� Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341; 156 ER 145
�� News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd [1996] ATPR 41-521
�� R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227
�� Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387

Thanks very very much for any help you can provide

[cheese]

Do this one coz it has something which sounds like it resembles bikes (Hadleys) .
�� Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341; 156 ER

Do this one because Codelfa sounds like a cod, and cod is funny.
#56256;� Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337

:confused:

[danv]

Do this one coz it has something which sounds like it resembles bikes (Hadleys) .
􀂾 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341; 156 ER

Do this one because Codelfa sounds like a cod, and cod is funny.
#56256;� Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337

:confused:
LOL that's what you get for asking!