Saw`II - sick (in every sense of the word)

[gravelclimber]

Just saw Saw II - damn that's one sick filum. Much better than the first one but it's pretty hardcore stuff (more so than se7en and Saw 1 (but not as sick as tubgirl - why did I ever google that?)). Story doesn't have the plot holes of the first one (anyone who could lie prostrate for 2 hours and not pass wind loudly is a better man than I).

Highly recommened - go see it (but don't take the kiddies).

[R33F]

Really enjoyed SAW, so am keen as mustard to check out the sequel.

[Kookman]

Havent seen it myself but apparently wolf creek is a real epic aswell.

[Browny_T]

Yeah, Saw 2 was really good. Definately better than the first I reckon.
They come up with some pretty good plot lines and twists and stuff.
Theres some pretty frightening happenings going on that movie.
I reccomend it though, it might be a little too long though, but worth the rediculous prices that the movie theatres are now charging.

[Ride_Guy]

Yeah its a good movie.. I didnt find it all that scary, its just a seriousluy sick film. LOL

Good none the less, recomend going to see it.

Wolf creek is another gooden :D

[turtle muncha]

yes i also went and to see it last night and enjoyed it
i dont think it went for to long, i think it was just right.
its got some exteremly hardcore scenes tho.

me and a mate took girlfriends, i wouldnt really recomend taking a female if you want to see it lol ;)
they nearly spewed.

i agree on it not been as scary as they first but it was alot better and alot more "twisted" than the first.
it also had a bit more of a plot than the first.

recomend to go see it people!!!!!!

[echo]

i thought SAW number one was great too. cant wait to see no 2!!!!

[punk_downhiller]

do u have to see number 1 to see number 2?? or is it the type of sequel that u can pick up from without seeing the first?

wolf creek was excellant (spelling??) not scarey as such but freaky in the sense that it is based on actual events.

[turtle muncha]

i would recomend seeing the first before you see the second.

yeah cant wait to see wolf creek, should be good.
might go see it this arvo if i cant be fucked :) lol

[pilot]

I just saw saw:)

Was pissed off because i over heard someone talking about the twist but was a little let down. There was too much hype. Will be interesting to see how the bigger budget affects the sequel.

But, Wolfcreek, now thats a whole other kettle of fish. People have talked about it being the most scary movie ever. I wouldn't call it scary, simply disturbing at how realistic the portrayels were, i'd never heard of head on a stick but goddam that was a pretty hectic scene, it didn't have the corny cliche's of so many other films in the genre. I'm surprised the Australian tourism bureau didn't try and talk them out of releasing it!! It might make a few Brit tourists think twice about heading off into the bush!

[rowanr]

Yeah, Saw 2 was really good. Definately better than the first I reckon.
They come up with some pretty good plot lines and twists and stuff.
Theres some pretty frightening happenings going on that movie.
I reccomend it though, it might be a little too long though, but worth the rediculous prices that the movie theatres are now charging.
i wouldn't go as far to say seeing a movie is expensive but you wouldn't want to go too often.. but thats why god invented tuesdays - so u can see a movie for $7.50!!

i really want to see saw 2, i loved the first one. it was just freaky and original, and australian! wouldn't mind seeing wolf creek too

[shirtz]

ha ha tub girl. not plesent


saw was pretty cool. great idea for a movie on a budget. i heard 2 wasnt as good, but hey ill give it a stab.

im still realing from wolfcreek. damn! head on a stick ;)

[DWNHLR01]

I went and saw saw II with my gf...NOT a good idea to sneak subway into the movie and eat it!

This movie was great though! althoug, the plot twist at the end wasn't as good as the first movie IMO.

[Ruckus_Lord]

Yeah, i saw Saw 2 and Wolf Creek, both are VERY good movies, Saw 2, very cleaver like the 1st one, and Wolf creek...well, ill let you see that for yourself....:eek:

Both great movies.

-Drew

[FuTAnT]

Yeah, Saw 2 was really good. Definately better than the first I reckon.
They come up with some pretty good plot lines and twists and stuff.
Theres some pretty frightening happenings going on that movie.
I reccomend it though, it might be a little too long though, but worth the rediculous prices that the movie theatres are now charging.

What's wrong with $7 at the Randwick ritz? :)

[zids]

planning on sneaking into that next weekend, should be mad fun, i absolutely love my horror movies. how does this compare to other movies you guys have seen e.g. is it scarier, softer, different and waht type of hooror e.g. gore or psycological

[ed the frog]

man i was a huge fan of the first SAW and watched it heaps of times. i just loved the psychological side to the story. SAW II i thought did not reach the first in the slightest. was still an enjoyable film but lacked a bit of reality. all those people in the house together didnt for a minute decide to work together, they all went solo and desided to kill each other. somehow in reality i dont think it would happen that way. i do like the twist at the end and the revisit to the original SAW set down in that creepy white tiled cell, where Adam is still chained to the pipe...that was COOL!

but yeah, lots of people still really liked it, i much prefer the first.

has anyone heard about this movie presented by Quentin Tarantino called HOSTEL?? it looks fuckin awesome! i wanna know when it comes out. check the link http://www.hostelfilm.com/

[Browny_T]

What's wrong with $7 at the Randwick ritz? :)

Nothing is wrong with that, its a good price. $12.50 at hoyts isn't.

[punk_downhiller]

woo i finally saw Saw 2....

omg it is 10x better than the first...and the end is really weird

it leaves it open for a Saw 3...hope there is

[|Matt|]

Yeah im with Punk_downhiller i think there will be a 3rd one and yes the 2nd one IMO was much much better than the first. Even though i was laughing my ass off through both of them i thought it was a very clever and well thought out idea. I sure hope they make another. Saw III...sounds cool :)

[punk_downhiller]

there is gonna be a Saw III...its been announced for release in 06, can't wait

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0489270/

but it will be different without the original 'jigsaw' guy

[|Matt|]

Oh awesome. Yeah it wont be the same without him. Creepy voice and all.
And i think you just ruined it for all the people who havent seen it.
I didnt ruin it because you already said it ;)

[punk_downhiller]

i was reading the user comments and apparently john/jigsaw doesn't die and still carries on playing his sick and twisted games....

also apparently Dr. Gordon (from Saw 1) makes a come back...that'd be awesome

[sasser]

it was a good movie, better than the first.

advice: dont let 2 chicks talk you into going to see it(altho i really wanted to- i just thaught that there would be better movies than a psychological thriller to go to if your planning on hooking up...) al;tho it wasnt all bad, they wanted to be "held " because they were "scared".
ever had the feeling youve just been mega duped.....

[freeride_sweet]

i didn't like it really... but i took my g/f at the time and she punished me with having to see harry pothead, the consequences (sp) far out weighed the enjoyment i got from the movie

kool ending again

[Alec McJo]

Saw 1 and 2 kicked ass, i hope 3 is good. Im hoping they dont kill the series, like alot of other horror movies where they go and make so many of them, it just gets old. Totally kills it, i hope they dont do that to Saw.

[sawtell]

i am yet to see saw 2, but i will hopefully see it tonight when i go fishing (thank god, for mates with new ipods videos, and unlimited download limits, and lets not forget pirate movies.!!:rolleyes: )


i found saw one rather scary, but worse was when i thought about who wrote the story, and how sick and twisted they must actually be to thikn of a movie like that...... but thats just what i think.