PDA

View Full Version : Cycling death report


gravelclimber
22-08-2006, 10:34 AM
OK, this is pretty morbid but here goes.

Apparently 60 % of fatal accidents involving cycling the cyclist is responsible according to this report.

http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/2006/pdf/death_cyclists_road.pdf

It's very interesting reading.

In 1996-2000 4wds, vans and utes accounted for 18 % of deaths (cars 40 %). In 2000-2004 4wds, vans and utes accounted for 16 % of deaths (cars 48 %).

The most dangerous time to ride is 3 - 6 pm weekdays.

What does everyone think of this report?

Here's the news.com.au take. http://blogs.news.com.au/news/crime/index.php/news/comments/pedalling_safety/

Cyclists constantly complain about motorists being out to kill them. But now new national research shows that more than 60 per cent of cyclists killed in road accidents were deemed to be at fault, including ignoring road signs or traffic lights, riding from the footpath into intersections without looking and swerving in front of cars.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau studied 665 cyclist deaths between 1991 and 2005. Children under the age of 15 accounted for 133 of the deaths, followed by 86 deaths amongst riders aged 15-19. The third highest number of deaths – 63 – was in riders aged over the age of 70.

Despite the wearing of helmets being made compulsory, a third of both male and female cyclists killed in road accidents between 1996-2000 were not wearing helmets.

The most common kind of fatal collision was cyclists being hit from behind by motor vehicles travelling in the same lane and in the same direction. The next most common type of accident was the cyclist riding from the footpath into an intersection or on to a road and being hit by an oncoming motor vehicle.

The most frequent cause for accidents was cyclists or motorists failing to see the other. “For cyclists, their visibility remains a key safety issue,” the ATSB report said.

Between 1996-2000, 14 out of 222 cyclists killed had failed to observe traffic signals or road signs. In another 13 crashes the bicycle had a ‘critical malfunction or defect’.

Despite the boom in cycle riding at weekends, weekdays were slightly more dangerous for cyclists. About 30 per cent of cyclist deaths on weekdays occurred between 3 pm and 6 pm. Relatively high numbers of cyclist deaths occurred between 4 pm and 6 pm on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays. The highest number of deaths occurred between 3 pm and 4 pm on Wednesdays.

Cycle safety is likely to prove an increasing problem with the growth in popularity of bike riding as a way to keep fit or beat rising petrol prices. According to the ATSB report, the number of bicycles sold in 2005 was 13 per cent greater than the number of motor vehicles sold and that more than a million bicycles were sold in Australia each year from 2002 to 2005.

“Cycling has significant health and environmental benefits for the community, but cycling on the roads has risks that need to be recognised by cyclists and motorists alike,” the report says.

Dozer
22-08-2006, 10:44 AM
There is some interesting statistics in that article. The amount of bikes sold compared to cars was a big surprise for me and the way the story narrowed down the actual danger times of day was also interesting.
I was surprised that there was nothing mentioned about people getting hit at night time, maybe the study wasn't too thorough?

arpit
22-08-2006, 11:27 AM
I was surprised that there was nothing mentioned about people getting hit at night time, maybe the study wasn't too thorough?

Maybe less people cycle at night than in peak hour traffic, coming back from work?

Dozer
22-08-2006, 11:48 AM
Maybe less people cycle at night than in peak hour traffic, coming back from work?

Yeah I figured that much ;), I was waiting to read the statistic of accidents at night and it never came.....maybe no one has been killed at night?:confused:

Dumbellina
22-08-2006, 11:55 AM
Here's my post on the News Forum...

For a legitimate form of transport and recreation, it seems very bizarre that killing a participant can be justifiable in the mind of the killer.

"I didn't see him/her" is the lamest excuse, and it is an excuse to move blame to the victim. There is a reason drivers don't see bikes and it has nothing at all to do with the rider. Riders ride intuitatively we sense the entire road environment and react accordingly - we see space completely differently to a driver. Drivers can barely see past their bonnets, and because they are moving a block of plastic and steel through space that is how they respond to the road.

I cycle from Belmore to the City every day and in my books the greatest danger to riders from cars is in roundabouts. Not only do most drivers ignore the rules governing roundabouts, but the "traffic furniture" (as Phil Ligget called it in the TDF), the concrete constructions designed to slow or control the flow of traffic, forces us into the path of the moving traffic.

So for you drivers who think its ok to kill a cyclist, would you consider it ok for a golfer to be killed by a careless driver in a golf cart. Would it be ok for a crickter to be killed by a mechanical roller. Would it be ok for swimmers to be killed by careless boat drivers. So if its not ok, then the "I didn't see them" excuse must be scrapped.

arpit
22-08-2006, 01:03 PM
"Cyclists constantly complain about motorists being out to kill them. But now new national research shows that more than 60 per cent of cyclists killed in road accidents were deemed to be at fault, including ignoring road signs or traffic lights, riding from the footpath into intersections without looking and swerving in front of cars."

I think that determinations of culpability made without input from one of the involved parties need to be taken with a grain of salt.

nizai
22-08-2006, 01:22 PM
On a similar note I was waiting at a red light the other day in Perth with 2 fellow commuters when a rider on a very expensive looking road bike, ran straight through the red, had to swerve around two cars coming at him, then once over the intersection hurled abuse at the drivers and gave them the finger.

Stupid much?

They are correct though, visibility is the key.

N

Weasel
22-08-2006, 04:49 PM
ok.... Im a truckie by trade and i freeride too... But ive hit 2 guys on pushies simply because they didnt look and came straight out in front of me.

You might say I should have seen them and you know what I did at the last moment... And stopping 75tons aint easy.
Experence goes a long way and with all these people taking to their bikes in reguards to petrol im not surprissed if this figure increases